What power does the universe build up

Simple theory is that Newton was wrong, Einstein can be improved, and dark matter does not exist

While recent studies have provided new insights into dark matter, one new theory is that dark matter does not exist at all. Furthermore, Newton's theories should not apply to a large part of the universe, Einstein was then mostly right, but his theories can still be improved. Dr. Hong Sheng Zhao of St. Andrews University in Scotland and Dr. Benoit Famaey from the Free University of Brussels have come up with a humble new theory and formula to explain gravity. If their theory is accepted, the universe must be viewed again in a whole new way. Newton "discovered" gravity when the famous apple fell on his head. This makes gravity the longest known force. However, as Newton quickly noted, it is unknown how gravity actually works. "I have not yet been able to explain the reason for these properties of gravity in terms of phenomena and I do not make any hypotheses [...]. That one body could act on another, to the distance through the empty one Space, without the mediation of anything through which their action and their strength could be guided from one to the other, that is, in my opinion, such a great absurdity that I do not believe any person who has a sufficient ability to think in philosophical matters can ever fall for it, "he wrote in 1687. Newton's theories in the late 17th century were excellently suited to precisely describing the movements of bodies on earth or in space, but a closer examination of the movement of celestial bodies reveals inadequacies. With his general theory of relativity, Einstein was the first to successfully develop Newton's theories further in 1905. General relativity said that light can curve, but it still failed to explain some things in the observable universe, including how much light should curve. For example, when observing the rotation of stars around a galaxy, the stars are moving too fast to be held by gravity, and they should be flung apart. However, this is not the case. This has led to two competing theories. The first, that of dark matter, has many followers. It says that an invisible substance and force makes up the majority of the universe. Dark matter holds everything together and compensates for the high speeds of stars. The second, lesser-known theory is that understanding gravity is simply not correct. While gravity is commonly believed to be a constant, this theory suggests that gravity can increase and allow objects to move faster than they should. This second theory offers good models for both a gravitational and a relativistic view of the universe. The "simple theory" developed by Zhao and Famaey builds on the second theory developed first by Moti Milgrom and later by Jacob Bekenstein. Dr. Zhao and Dr. Famaey developed a formula that allows gravity to change over different distances. So far, the formula has been consistent with the observations of galaxies - the studies of dark matter do not make this possible so easily. Dr. Zhao explains how Newton's calculations are impractical when using today's measurements: "It is not obvious how an apple would fall in a galaxy. Newton's theory would be very far off [...]. There was always a certain probability that an apple would fall into a galaxy. that astronomers are rewriting the law of gravity [...]. So far it shows consistency with galaxy data and if the predictions for the solar system and cosmology are verified it could solve the mystery of dark matter. We may then be able to known questions, such as whether Einstein's theory of gravity is correct and whether so-called dark matter exists, have to be answered. " "A non-Newtonian theory of gravity is now fully specified on all scales by a smooth, continuous function. Now it can be refuted by other scientists. It is now time to be open to new fields predicted by our formula while we continue to search for dark matter particles, "said Dr. Zhao. Neither scientist, however, believes the issue of gravity is necessarily resolved, and they do believe that more complete answers must continue to be sought. Dr. Famaey said: "It is possible that neither the modified theory of gravity nor the theory of dark matter, as they are formulated today, solve all problems of galactic dynamics or cosmology. The truth could in principle be somewhere in between, but it is very plausible." that we do not know something fundamental about gravity and that a radically new theoretical approach is necessary to solve all of these problems, yet our formula is so wonderfully simple that it is tempting to use it as part of an as yet unknown fundamental theory See. All galaxy data seem easy to explain. " The research results were published in Astrophysical Journal Letters on February 10th and will be presented at an international workshop from April 20th to 22nd at the Royal Observatory in Edinburgh.